Alert - U.S. Senate Backs Military Force On Iran
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDpihSGv5k8&feature=youtu.be
http://youtu.be/tDpihSGv5k8
Sunday, February 26, 2012
یوسف ندرخانی کشیش ایرانی محکوم به اعدام رژیم خامنه ای
http://youtu.be/f81C20PXcXA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f81C20PXcXA
Sure, Iran’s rational
http://m.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/sure_iran_rational_pfqSjZ7qDR5Zc7ar63KY4J
Sure, Iran’s rational
By RICH LOWRY
Last Updated: 11:07 PM, February 24, 2012
The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, thinks that Iran is a “rational actor.” He is indisputably correct.
Iran has, quite rationally, concluded that if it spins thousands of centrifuges to enrich enough uranium, it will soon have the bomb. Just as rationally, it believes it can string along the West. Then there’s its airtight chain of cause and effect in the alleged plot against the Saudi ambassador to America: If it hired a Mexican drug gang, and that gang blew up a Washington, DC, restaurant, and the Saudi ambassador was dining there at the time, the ambassador would die. Q.E.D.
Gen. Dempsey said too little and too much about the Iranian regime. Tehran couldn’t have made itself into the world’s foremost exporter of terror and extended its tentacles throughout the Middle East without resorting to rational calculation. That’s obvious. What Dempsey is implying, though, is that a regime capable of such calculation can necessarily be deterred if it gets a nuclear weapon. That’s an unsupportable leap.
If there’s one thing we should have established beyond doubt during the past decade, it is that involvement in terror attacks on American soil is extremely costly to the perpetrators. Nonetheless, according to the US government, the Iranians hatched a plot against the Saudi ambassador where the risk bore no relation whatsoever to the possible reward — from our perspective.
More fundamentally from our perspective, there is no point in establishing a theocracy, killing innocents abroad, pursuing sectarian war, crushing protesters, denying the Holocaust and threatening Israel with annihilation, either. From the point of view of the Western liberal tradition, the Islamic Republic itself makes no sense. Yet there it is, withstanding punishing economic sanctions to pursue the weapon that the regime wouldn’t want in the first place if it accepted international norms.
If the Soviets, the famous “evil empire” bristling with thousands of nuclear weapons, could be deterred, why not Iran? The Soviet leadership became more pragmatic over time. After Nikita Khrushchev renounced Josef Stalin, it didn’t believe that war with its enemies was imminent and inevitable. Iran’s religio-ideological fire, in contrast, is still burning hot.
A highly ideological leadership with a sense of desperate urgency is the enemy of deterrence. In 1941, Dean Acheson rightly said: “No rational Japanese could believe an attack on us could result in anything but disaster.” Except the Japanese — driven by a sense of honor alien to us — believed that they only had two choices: getting squeezed out of China by America, or launching a risky war.
Even in the Cold War, deterrence almost failed. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the airstrike and invasion pushed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff might well have unwittingly prompted a nuclear exchange. The defense secretary at the time, the late Bob McNamara, maintained that “we lucked out.” Ah, yes, that crucial backstop to deterrence — luck.
The Israelis can be forgiven for not feeling lucky. Do we think Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei will establish a “red telephone” to smooth out misunderstandings after Iran goes nuclear?
The Iranian regime is factionalized, and it is sure to be the most fanatical elements that control the nukes. It is also prone to bouts of popular unrest threatening its existence. If the regime ever believes it is going down, national martyrdom might look gloriously alluring.
In March 1945, Adolf Hitler gave his infamous Nero Decree, essentially calling for the destruction of Germany. After the first US atomic attack on Hiroshima, the Japanese war minister mused about how wonderful it would be if his nation were destroyed “like a beautiful flower.” It is in this tradition that former Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani — a relative pragmatist — said that “even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality.”
On his own perverse terms, Rafsanjani’s reasoning is unassailable. He’s just another “rational actor.”
comments.lowry@nationalreview.com
Iran has, quite rationally, concluded that if it spins thousands of centrifuges to enrich enough uranium, it will soon have the bomb. Just as rationally, it believes it can string along the West. Then there’s its airtight chain of cause and effect in the alleged plot against the Saudi ambassador to America: If it hired a Mexican drug gang, and that gang blew up a Washington, DC, restaurant, and the Saudi ambassador was dining there at the time, the ambassador would die. Q.E.D.
Gen. Dempsey said too little and too much about the Iranian regime. Tehran couldn’t have made itself into the world’s foremost exporter of terror and extended its tentacles throughout the Middle East without resorting to rational calculation. That’s obvious. What Dempsey is implying, though, is that a regime capable of such calculation can necessarily be deterred if it gets a nuclear weapon. That’s an unsupportable leap.
If there’s one thing we should have established beyond doubt during the past decade, it is that involvement in terror attacks on American soil is extremely costly to the perpetrators. Nonetheless, according to the US government, the Iranians hatched a plot against the Saudi ambassador where the risk bore no relation whatsoever to the possible reward — from our perspective.
More fundamentally from our perspective, there is no point in establishing a theocracy, killing innocents abroad, pursuing sectarian war, crushing protesters, denying the Holocaust and threatening Israel with annihilation, either. From the point of view of the Western liberal tradition, the Islamic Republic itself makes no sense. Yet there it is, withstanding punishing economic sanctions to pursue the weapon that the regime wouldn’t want in the first place if it accepted international norms.
If the Soviets, the famous “evil empire” bristling with thousands of nuclear weapons, could be deterred, why not Iran? The Soviet leadership became more pragmatic over time. After Nikita Khrushchev renounced Josef Stalin, it didn’t believe that war with its enemies was imminent and inevitable. Iran’s religio-ideological fire, in contrast, is still burning hot.
A highly ideological leadership with a sense of desperate urgency is the enemy of deterrence. In 1941, Dean Acheson rightly said: “No rational Japanese could believe an attack on us could result in anything but disaster.” Except the Japanese — driven by a sense of honor alien to us — believed that they only had two choices: getting squeezed out of China by America, or launching a risky war.
Even in the Cold War, deterrence almost failed. During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the airstrike and invasion pushed by the Joint Chiefs of Staff might well have unwittingly prompted a nuclear exchange. The defense secretary at the time, the late Bob McNamara, maintained that “we lucked out.” Ah, yes, that crucial backstop to deterrence — luck.
The Israelis can be forgiven for not feeling lucky. Do we think Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu and
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei will establish a “red telephone” to smooth out misunderstandings after Iran goes nuclear?
The Iranian regime is factionalized, and it is sure to be the most fanatical elements that control the nukes. It is also prone to bouts of popular unrest threatening its existence. If the regime ever believes it is going down, national martyrdom might look gloriously alluring.
In March 1945, Adolf Hitler gave his infamous Nero Decree, essentially calling for the destruction of Germany. After the first US atomic attack on Hiroshima, the Japanese war minister mused about how wonderful it would be if his nation were destroyed “like a beautiful flower.” It is in this tradition that former Iranian President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani — a relative pragmatist — said that “even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality.”
On his own perverse terms, Rafsanjani’s reasoning is unassailable. He’s just another “rational actor.”
comments.lowry@nationalreview.com
Saturday, February 25, 2012
Anti-Putin rally held in his hometown
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/E/EU_RUSSIA_PROTEST?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-02-25-08-05-47
ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (AP) -- About 3,500 people demonstrated against Vladimir Putin on Saturday in Russia's second-largest city a week before presidential elections in which he seeks to return to the Kremlin.
The protesters marched through St. Petersburg's streets, chanting slogans against the prime minister, including "Putin is a thief," before gathering at a square. Police presence was heavy, but no arrests were reported in the rally, which had official sanction.
The turnout was smaller than many of the demonstrations that broke out in Russia after fraud-tainted parliamentary elections in December. Several protests in Moscow have drawn 50,000 or more, the largest show of public anger in post-Soviet Russia.
Putin, who was Russian president in 2000-2008, is widely expected to win against four challengers in the March 4 election.
But the unprecedented wave of protest has undermined his carefully cultivated image of a man who rules with both steely control and the affection of his people. Although Russia has prospered under Putin, Russians became increasingly dismayed by the stifling political climate he engineered.
"I came here because I want fair elections ... We have monarchy and not democracy in our country, and we should be honest about that at least, and say that we have monarchy," said one of the protesters, 40-year-old lawyer Irina Mitrophanova.
"I want our country, my children and grandchildren, to live better. I don't want them to feel like slaves," said another demonstrator, retiree Irina Stepanova.
The protest movement draws much of its support from Western-oriented liberals, and it is unclear whom among Putin's challengers they would support. Billionaire and New Jersey Nets owner Mikhail Prokhorov is the most liberal, but some suspect his candidacy is essentially a Kremlin strategy to siphon off votes from other challengers.
Before Saturday's rally, one of the protest movement's most popular figures, anti-corruption activist Alexei Navalny, told reporters that the opposition's position is "we must vote for any candidate but Putin."
A candidate needs at least 50 percent of the nationwide vote to win outright; otherwise the top two would face off in a second round. Being forced into a runoff would seriously weaken Putin, even if he ultimately emerged as the victor.
Sergei Udaltsov, a leader of the opposition Left Front movement, told the crowd on the square in St. Petersburg that new protests should erupt if the election does not go into a runoff.
"If we are deceived again on March 4, then on March 5 we should begin to strike," he said.
Besides Prokhorov, the challengers to Putin are Communist Party chief Gennady Zyuganov, ultranationalist Vladimir Zhirinovsky and socialist Just Russia leader Sergei Mironov.
On Sunday, opposition activists in Moscow aim for a visually striking protest - a chain of tens of thousands holding hands along the Garden Ring, a 16-kilometer (10-mile) network of wide avenues encircling central Moscow.
---
Jim Heintz in Moscow contributed to this report.
دوستان آمریکائی احمدی نژاد Ahmadinejad and Company
Free Speech, anti war and peace: IRI Lobby and Aradeshir Ommani (AIFC) and NIAC style
Watch Mr. Dai's revealing documentary on Ahamdinejad and Family and pay particular attention to the 17:00 min. part where Ardeshir Ommani, President of AIFC (American Iranian Friendship Committee) yanks the microphone when an Iranian lady tries tp talk about human rights violations in Iran. The man who finally pusher her off is Hammad Jamshidi a British born Iranian who recently attended NIAC's leadership conference as an Iranian-American. Throughout the 18 minute video various IRI supporters and apologists appear, including Kaveh Esfandiari and Hooman Majd....and to think that this is happening in America!!!!!
AIFC Director Ommani grabbing the Mic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZvkQkUDP2pohttp://youtu.be/ZvkQkUDP2po
They are trying to kick me out!.avi
Minute 27:00 afterward
See how AIFC president Ardeshir Ommani tries to stop a pro democracy Iranian from speaking out against IRI human Rights violations.
 |
| When she tried to talk about IRI crimes, Ommani cut her off |
 |
| Ommani attempting to yank mic off |
 |
| Ommani IRI apologist |
 |
| Hooman Majd and AIFC |
Trita Parsi and NIAC for Sale to the Highest Bidder!
PDMI has always maintained that the "Sky is falling" rhetoric of Iranian lobby (NIAC, CASMII, AIC, CAIR) and American anti-war left is designed to distract from Islamic Republic's nuclear program, its gross human rights violations, or prevailing crisis of the moment created by IRI, such as a plot to kill Saudi's Ambassador.
In a more sinister way, by manufacturing crises of imminent war, IRI lobby, in part funded by Oil Companies, has helped with the escalation of oil prices which mutually serves Oil Tycoons, Obama's and IRI's interests. Obama wants for oil to remain high to justify the need for alternative energy, it is a part of his energy policy. The US oil conglomerate also benefits hugely for high oil prices. IRI needs for oil prices to remain above $80 per barrel to break even and continue supporting the its Basij operation in Syria, Taliban, and Iraqi and Afghani insurgents.
Also, considering that more than 75% of IRI income is derived from oil exports and that IRI relies heavily on high oil prices to support its terrorism, expand its Islamic ideology beyond Iran's borders and crushing its dissidents, it is natural to see why IRI lobby, whose very aim is the survival of the regime, has been hard at work within the past decade (off and on) hyping the threat of imminent war by Israel and the US against Iran.
Trita's repetitive mail-outs since its inception and especially within the past 6 months warning of imminent war is only too fresh and plenty of documentation exists to prove NIAC and CASMII's efforts to scare Iranians and make Israel and the US and Iranian pro-democracy groups look as war mongers. Now, Trita does not foresee any war! Why the change?
Iranians and for that matter Americans should have plenty of reasons to view Trita's (the so called Iran expert) 180 degree turn with skepticism. PDMI views Trita as an intellectually dishonest Islamist and a despicable character and an opportunist who has made a religion out of making money and could care less about the plight of Iranians and their suffering under the criminal regime. Lately, NIAC has also been approaching the Republican establishment, perhaps sensing Obama as a "one-term" president. It also looks like that behind the scene, Obama and IRI have cut a deal. IRI, to ensure its survival, it might seem like that it is willing to sacrifice Bashar al Asad. IRI is notorious for throwing its friends and allies under the bus once they have exhausted their usefulness.
Or it just might be that, Trita is no longer serves a good purpose by the IRI and the regime no longer sees him as its "useful idiot." I reference the scathing criticism of Trita's recent book by the Leveretts known as lobby for the Ahmadinejad's camp.
There certainly seems to be a rift between Trita and his masters and Trita is shopping for a new master. Interestingly, a week ago, one of NIAC's protege ambassadors, Majid Rafizadeh, echoed similar anti-IRI remarks and advocated for sanctions and intervention on Syria, IRI staunch ally in the Middle East, I guess to set the stage. Interesting NIAC has in the past claimed that sanctions do not work and has advocated for dialogue and diplomacy with criminals! Again, why the change?
PDMI has always maintained that NIAC is a lobby organization and as such it is for sale to the highest bidder. Maybe NIAC has found a more lucrative customer for its lobby business: Saudi Arabia or Israel come to mind- only time will tell.
NIAC's, lack of transparency and its leadership's turning of a blind eye to the crimes committed by IRI officials is nothing new to the Iranian American community. NIAC's 180 degree turns are also well known amongst the Iranian-Americans. It was not a long time ago that Trita claimed that "NIAC was not a human rights organization and it did not have the expertise." but when its leadership saw lucrative grants available for human rights and democracy funding, it made a 180 degree and became a human rights advocate, almost overnight.
Despicable Trita is famous for slandering brave Iranians fighting the regime as MEK operatives and for its Cyber Army attacks on Iranian political activists, which I believe is connected to and originated from Tehran's IRGC cyber attack enterprise (Mahdid's Army). It will be interesting to see if Trita's throwing of the IRI under the bus this time around, is yet another clever ploy by Trita or a genuine "have seen the light" moment? Iranians are once bitten twice shy about NIAC and its opportunist president Trita Parsi. But one thing is for sure: NIAC's contradictions should never cease to amaze or surprise anyone and as the saying goes: Whichever way the wind blows, Trita will be there.
In a 2012 Survey of over 2,500 Iranian Americans, 95% stated that they view Trita Parsi and NIAC are lobbyists for the Islamic Republic in Iran and only 4% believed that NIAC is a human rights organization. More than 1,300 have signed a facebook Cause demanding the investigation of NIAC for the violation of lobby rules and failing to register as a foreign agent. An earlier similar cause which had reached 2,600 cause members claiming that NIAC was a lobbyist for the Islamic Republic was shut down by NIAC's Cyber Army, in 2011.
Arash Irandoost, Founder
PDMI
www.pdmiran.org
Now the rest of the story:
__________________________________________________
http://www.c-span.org/Events/Experts-Discuss-the-Middle-East-Israel-Iran-and-the-Arabs/10737428442-1/
Trita Parsi in the Lion's Den
http://www.iranian.com/main/blog/faramarz/trita-parsi-lions-denby Faramarz
24-Feb-2012
Trita stated that he does not foresee an Israeli attack on Iran in 2012. It is noteworthy that his opinion about the topic is in sharp contrast to the war-talk and hysteria that we have been seeing from NIAC/CASMII and other like-minded contributors on Iranian.com.
To set the stage, the 1:30 hour panel discussion was opened by Woodrow Wilson President, the ex-Congresswoman Jane Harman of Venice Beach, CA who is the daughter of a Holocaust survivor and back in 2009 talked about dividing Iran along ethnic lines to reduce its threats!
The discussions were moderated by Aaron David Miller a veteran State Department Middle East expert and participated by Ephraim Sneh, the former Israeli Deputy Defense Minister, Ghaith al-Omari, the Director of American Task Force on Palestine and Trita Parsi of NIAC.
The opening statements starting at 0:15 minutes immediately made it quite clear that the Israeli and the Arab panelists clearly understood the threats posed by the Regime. The Israeli panelist argued that a nuclear-armed Iran will result in nuclear arms in Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt which by the Islamist “Pakistani” tendencies of these countries will place the future Israeli generations under the nuclear threat by one Iran and three Pakistans! A prospect that is completely unacceptable to Israeli leaders.
The Arab panelist was quite blunt about the Arab-Persian, Sunni-Shia divide and the fact that Arabs and Iranians are not natural allies and how the “Arab Spring” has taken the wind out of the Regime’s claims about “Arab Street” leadership and the Regional dominance.
Trita (starting at 37:30) acknowledged the significant hit that the Regime’s influence has taken in the Arab world following the Arab Spring and the current situation in Syria. But he overplayed the current divergence between the US and the Israeli perspectives regarding Iran, and in general stuck to his talking points.
The best part of the discussions was the Q/A segment starting at 51:00. Trita stated that he does not foresee an Israeli attack on Iran in 2012. It is noteworthy that his opinion about the topic is in sharp contrast to the war-talk and hysteria that we have been seeing from NIAC/CASMII and other like-minded contributors on Iranian.com.
In the last ten minutes (starting at 1:19:00) the Israeli panelist put Trita on the spot and asked him point-blank about the Regime in Iran and what should be done about it, Trita replied by saying that the Regime is repressive and the Iranian people will at some point get rid of it. But he quickly went back to his talking points of targeted sanctions and negotiations.
In my opinion, Trita and NIAC, given the realities of the time are beginning to see the light and the end of the Regime, but they are still struggling with their long standing stated policies and have not been able to articulate a clear message on how to go forward. That will ultimately make them irrelevant.
http://www.c-span.org/Events/Experts-Discuss-the-Middle-East-Israel-Iran-and-the-Arabs/10737428442-1/
Friday, February 24, 2012
US State Department Press Statement on the Execution Order for the Iranian Pastor
US State Department Press Statement on the Execution Order for the Iranian Pastor Yousef Nadarkhani by the Islamic Republic of IRAN.
"The United States is deeply concerned by reports that a provincial court has renewed the execution order for Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani. Mr. Nadarkhani is facing a death sentence on charges of apostasy and has refused to recant his Christian faith. Such government persecution for simply following one’s faith is common in Iran, where followers of many religious traditions face harsh treatment and severe violations of their religious freedom. We have also witnessed a dramatic increase in the arrest of adherents to the Baha’i Faith recently, as well as an increase in repression of freedom of expression in all forms. We stand with religious and political leaders from around the world in condemning Youcef Nadarkhani’s conviction and call for his immediate release."
State Department, Washington, D.C.
Acting Spokesperson Mark Toner
Thursday, February 23, 2012
راز بزرگ و ترسناک زندگی علی خامنه ای بر ملا شد Khamenei was educated In Russia
سه شنبه شب، ۲۱ فوریه ۲۰۱۲ همراه یکی از دوستان روی مقاله ای در خصوص نقش جمهوری اسلامی در ترورهای اخیر کار می کردیم. در حین تحقیقات، همکارم اتفاقی به نکته ای عجیب برخورد کرد و از من پرسید: آیا علی خامنه ای هیچوقت در روسیه بوده است؟ با تعجب گفتم که من هیچگاه چنین چیزی نشنیده ام و بانگاهی به زندگینامه خامنه ای روی وبسایت رسمی اش متوجه شدم که اصلا به این نکته اشاره نشده است. لینک این ویدیو را برایم فرستاد و با چشمان حیرت زده ویدیو را دیدم و در حالی که عرق سردی بر تمام بدنم نشسته بود، به راز بزرگ و ترسناک زندگی سید علی خامنه ای پی بردم. این ویدیو گزارشی کوتاه از مراسم جشن پنجاهمین سالگرد تاسیس دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا در شهر مسکو، پایتخت روسیه است که توسط تلویزیون دولتی روسیه "آر تی" تهیه شده است.
گزارشگر تلویزیون روسیه اشاره میکند که در جشن ۵۰ سالگی دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا، معروف به دانشگاه دوستی مردم روسیه، هزاران فارغ التحصیل این دانشگاه در شهر مسکو گرد هم جمع شدند. هدف این دانشگاه که بیش از پنجاه سال پیش تاسیس شده است، تربیت "گروهی از نخبگان در سراسر جهان" است. ولادیمیر فلیپف، رئیس این دانشگاه می گوید: سی درصد از دانشجویان این دانشگاه را دانشجویان خارجی تشکیل میدهند و دانشگاه ما نه تنها در زمینه علوم سیاسی بلکه علوم انسانی "گروهی از نخبگان جهانی" را تربیت کرده و به کشورهای متبوعشان بازمیگرداند. وی افزوده است که عمده دانشجویان خارجی این دانشگاه از کشورهای آفریقایی، آسیایی و آمریکای لاتین هستند که این نخبگان می توانند با فارغ التحصیلان دانشگاه های آمریکایی و اروپایی رقابت کنند. حدود یکصد هزار فارغ التحصیل این دانشگاه در ۱۶۵ کشور جهان در حال کار و فعالیت هستند. گزارشگر تلویزیون دولتی روسیه، سید علی خامنه ای رهبر جمهوری اسلامی، محمود عباس رئیس تشکیلات خود گردان فلسطین و رئیس جمهور هندوراس را بعنوان تعدادی از دانشجویان برجسته این دانشگاه معرفی می کند.
در ادامه این گزارش عنوان می شود که "دانشگاه دوستی مردم روسیه" در سال ۱۹۶۰ یعنی دقیقا در سالی که بسیاری از کشورهای آفریقایی استقلال یافتند، تاسیس شده است. این دانشگاه برای یادگیری سایر کشورها از تجربیات اتحاد جماهیر شوروی و ارتباط هرچه نزدیکتر با این کشور ایجاد شده است. عبدالرحمن سیلا در وصف این دانشگاه می گوید: ما باید بدانیم که این یک نهاد آموزشی منحصر بفرد است. این دانشگاه از بدو تاسیس فرصتی را برای جوانان مستعد از کشورهای در حال توسعه فراهم کرد تا بتوانند از امکانات آموزشی با کیفیتی استفاده کنند. امروز هم این رویه ادامه دارد و جوانان پس از تحصیل در این دانشگاه به کشورهای خود بازمی گردند و تبدیل به "رهبران در زمینه های خاص" می گردند! وی معتقد است که جهان به این دانشگاه نیاز دارد.
این تعریف دولت روسیه از دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا است. اما ببینیم واقعیت این دانشگاه و راز افسانه ای و ترسناک حضور سید علی خامنه ای رهبر خود خوانده مسلمین جهان در این دانشگاه چیست!؟ بر پایه اسناد و گزارشهای موثق، دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا یا همان دانشگاه دوستی مردم روسیه، در سال ۱۹۶۰ با مدیریت مستقیم سازمان مخوف امنیت شوروی معروف به "کا گ ب" تاسیس شد و از همان آغاز تحت عنوان "آکسفورد تروریستها" شناخته می شد. دکتر ایلان برمن در جزوه ای تحقیقاتی تحت عنوان روسیه و خلا قدرت در خاور میانه که ژوئن سال ۲۰۰۱ منتشر کرد، دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا را آکادمی تربیت نیروهای ضد آمریکایی برای کشورهای جهان سوم، خطاب میکند که البته بسیاری از مدیران فعلی جمهوری اسلامی از آنجا فارغ التحصیل شده اند و از جمله سید علی خامنه ای و غلامحسین محسنی اژه ای
از دیگر چهره های سرشناسی که فارغ التحصیل این دانشگاه هستند، تروریست ونزوئلایی ایلیچ رامیرز سانچز معروف به کارلوس شغال را میتوان نام برد که در حال حاضر دوران محکومیت حبس ابد را در زندانی در فرانسه می گذراند. وی یکی از بزرکترین تروریستهای تاریخ است که عملیات چریکی و تروریستی را در دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا فرا گرفت و به ماموریتهای بین المللی اعزام شد. پدر وی یک مارکسیست معتقد بود که نام پسرش را به جهت علاقه فراوان به لنین یلیچ گذاشت که نام پدری لنین میباشد. برادران وی را هم لنین و ولادیمیر نامید
همچنین فیدل کاسترو، یاسر عرفات و هوگو چاوز از دیگر تعلیمه یافتگان این مرکز بزرگ پرورش تروریست هستند. در واقع این
دانشگاه جوانان مستعد را از کشورهای آفریقایی ، آمریکای جنوبی ، خاور میانه و آسیا انتخاب کرده و به آنها بورسهای بسیار خوب دولتی می داده تا با اصول انقلابیگری مارکسیستی و ضد آمریکایی آشنا شوند و سپس به کشورها یشان بازگشته و مقدمات انقلاب را فراهم کنند ، که البته عمدتا با مبارزات چریکی و مسلحانه توأم بوده است. آموزشهای جنگ روانی، کار با انواع اسلحه، نبرد های چریکی، سازماندهی باند های سیاسی مخالف و مسلح و تصفیه حسابهای خونین پس از انقلاب از مجموعه دروس این دانشگاه به خصوص در فاصله سالهای ۱۹۶۴ تا ۱۹۷۴ بوده است. بسیاری از انقلابهای چپگرایانه در این سالها ریشه در دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا داشته اند. هدف نهایی ایجاد شبکه ای بزرگ از رهبران انقلابی در سراسر جهان بود که همه آنها روابط نزدیک و ویژه ای با اتحاد جماهیر شوروی داشته باشند و به این شکل بتوانند حلقه محاضره را بر کشورهای بلوک سرمایه داری یا دموکراسیهای غربی تنگ و تنگ تر کرده و به رؤیای جهان یک دست شده مارکسیستی جامه عمل بپوشانند
بزرگترین راز زندگی سید علی خامنه ای در مصرف روزانه خاویار یا بوقلمون و یا سواری بر اسبهای اصیل عربی و حیف و میل بیت المال خلاصه نمی شود. بزرگترین و ترسناکترین راز زندگی خامنه ای مربوط به دورانی است که هیچ اشاره ای به آن در زندگینامه های وی نشده است و پرده از اسرار بسیاری در خصوص ماهیت رژیم جمهوری اسلامی بر میدارد. خامنه ای در سال ۱۹۶۴ میلادی برابر با ۱۳۴۳ خورشیدی به شوروی سفر می کند و در دانشگاه پاتریس لومومبا وابسته به سازمان امنیت شوروی به تحصیل مشغول می شود.
پرسش کلیدی اینجاست که در سالهای دهه شصت میلادی که هیچ خبری از انقلاب در ایران نبود، دلیل حضور سید علی خامنه ای در دانشگاه رسمی سازمان امنیت شوروی چه میتوانست باشد؟ آیا جز اینکه ایشان در اندیشه تبدیل شدن به جاسوس امپریالیسم شرق برای مبارزه با شاه و امپریالیسم غرب بود؟
به نظر می رسد سید علی پرچم ولایت فقیه و جانشینی برحق امام زمان را بواسطه شجره نامه ساختگی اش از دستان آن امام غایب دریافت نکرده است و این پرچم را در مرکز تربیت تروریست شوروی از دستان نمایندگان لنین و استالین گرفته است تا بتواند تیشه ای بر پیکره امپریالیسم آمریکا بزند. حالا با بر ملا شدن این راز تکلیف "ذوب شدگان در ولایت" چه می شود که به عشق وساطت مولایشان برای ورود به بهشت، خون پاکترین جوانان ایرانزمین را بر سنگفرش خیابان ها ریخته اند؟ راستی گیرم که ما دروغ می گوییم و شایعه برای مقام عظمای ولایت ساخته ایم، دولت روسیه چه دلیلی دارد که به دروغ سید علی خامنه ای را فارغ التحصیل این دانشگاه معرفی کند و چرا خامنه ای چیزی از ارتباطش با این دانشگاه و تحصیل در آن را در زندگینامه اش نیاورده است؟ خیلی دوست دارم نظر کسانی را که نه تنها نقطه سیاه ، بلکه هیچ نقطه خاکستری در زندگی خامنه ای ندیده بودند را در این مورد
بدانم.
http://cispress.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1175:1390-12-03-11-02-12&catid=31:general&Itemid=58
بدانم.
http://cispress.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1175:1390-12-03-11-02-12&catid=31:general&Itemid=58
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
A Bad Day For America In Iran, Syria And Afghanistan
A Bad Day For America In Iran, Syria And Afghanistan
Robert Johnson
http://www.businessinsider.com/bi-bad-day-for-america-in-iran-syria-and-afghanistan-2012-2
Tuesday Feb. 21 was a bad day for the U.S. in Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan.
In Afghanistan, protests against Americans who incinerated Korans at a military prison became so violent that Afghan police fired on protesters killing three people. The anger is widespread, and more than 30 people have been wounded in protests throughout the country.
Afghans are forming outside compounds filled with police, contractors, and coalition forces chanting "death to America." This will do nothing but hurt American forces still fighting there, and make continued operations there through 2014 more difficult.
In Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad enjoys the support of Iran, China and Russia, conditions are growing too dire for the U.S. to ignore.
The city of Homs, with the largest governing body in Syria and the largest number of anti-Assad protesters, is getting repeatedly shelled by government forces and Tuesday the attacks killed two Western journalists.
Robert Johnson
http://www.businessinsider.com/bi-bad-day-for-america-in-iran-syria-and-afghanistan-2012-2
Tuesday Feb. 21 was a bad day for the U.S. in Iran, Syria, and Afghanistan.
In Afghanistan, protests against Americans who incinerated Korans at a military prison became so violent that Afghan police fired on protesters killing three people. The anger is widespread, and more than 30 people have been wounded in protests throughout the country.
Afghans are forming outside compounds filled with police, contractors, and coalition forces chanting "death to America." This will do nothing but hurt American forces still fighting there, and make continued operations there through 2014 more difficult.
In Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad enjoys the support of Iran, China and Russia, conditions are growing too dire for the U.S. to ignore.
The city of Homs, with the largest governing body in Syria and the largest number of anti-Assad protesters, is getting repeatedly shelled by government forces and Tuesday the attacks killed two Western journalists.
Monday, February 20, 2012
A few questions of Hossein Companieh چند سوال آسان از حسین کمپانیه
چند سوال آسان از حسین کمپانیه
A few questions of Hossein Companieh (aka (HC, Javid Iran, Peymanmeli, etc.)
آقای حسین کمپانیه که همیشه بیشتر ایرانیان فعال و مبارز را مورد حمله،توهین و اتهام بدون مدرک و پشت پرده قرار میدهید.
آقای کمپانیه که به خود اجازه میدهید همه مخالفین با نطرات شما را مورد سوال قرار دهید.
چند سوال داشته و منتظر جوابتان هستم:
Do you deny that this is your company?
آیا انکار میکنید که شما و همسرتان صاحب این شرکت میباشید؟
مگر شما و خانمتان صاحب این کمپانی که اسمش
Sanibrite, Inc.
میباشد، نیستید؟
Aren't you and your spouse President and Vice Presidents of Sanibrite, Inc.?
چرا از طریق این شرکت نمادی با جمهوری اسلامی رابطه بر قرر کرده بودید و کدام مواد شیمیایی و کالا های دیگر را به ایران
صادر می کردید؟
As a janitorial and cleaning company, precisely what have you been exporting to and importing from the Islamic Republic, since 1987?
Or a better question: How did you manage do business with the mullahs, while pretending to be a member of the opposition?
چرا بعد از کشف حویت تان این شرکت را از لیست دولتی کانادا خارج ساختید؟
Why did you immediately, after my exposure of your trade with the Islamic Republic, removed your company from the Industry Canada (ic.ga.ca)?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)